Kansas City Confidential (08/84)

I was flown to Kansas City by ABC-TV’s Nightline to participate in a special show on the first Jacksons’ concert. Run by Ted Koppel, the program included interviews with fans, writer Nelson George, promoter Chuck Sullivan, Cliff Wallace of the New Orleans Superdome (Sullivan’s biggest critic), and Jackie Jackson, who is on the injury list. The keynote was the opening line: “Kansas City is not only where the tour begins—it may be where the turmoil ends.”

Lucky to have the last segment, I “reviewed” the 30 minutes of the concert I’d been able to see before the live broadcast began. I said it was a good show, solid, well-rehearsed, and standard: familiar material pre­sented in a familiar manner. (As for the lasers, lights, explosions, and skits suggesting the Resurrection, Star Wars, and the Sword in the Stone, which were all Chuck Sullivan talked about, that was part of what was standard about the performance and the music. That is, the show included a cover-up of what music and performance can produce, of how far they can go.) I tried, not too successfully, to convey my shock at the composition of the audience: perhaps 5 percent black in a 30 percent black city; an audience not just 95 percent white but overwhelmingly moneyed—blacks, too. And not in any sense a “rock & roll” audience: One saw mostly little kids and parents in their 40s and 50s, who met no one but spoke politely amongst themselves. I was willing to bet that a good proportion of the crowd had never been to anything like a rock & roll show before—a newborn baby abandoned by its parents would have been safe in this crowd.

As a typical rock critic, not satisfied unless the meaning of life is revealed to a good beat in a context of peace, harmony, and cathartic violence, I yearned for someone to throw something, or at least to litter. My ABC babysitter, a black reporter in her 30s, kept muttering, “I don’t believe this,” as people in Polo, Guess, Espirit, and Calvin Klein surrounded us. Pretty soon we had a duet going.

Koppel’s last question on Nightline was straightforward: “Thirty dollars a crack—is it worth it?” I said no, because it was a good standard show; because there were other shows that offered as much or more for far less; and because no matter how good it might have been, the show was not worth it when a great proportion of its natural audience, a great proportion of the people who had made Michael Jackson the artist and the social phenomenon that he is, were automatically excluded because they could not pay $30 per ticket. The media had been full of news that Michael Jackson, in a historic act of damage control, had the day before pledged to donate all the money he might make from the tour (estimates were in the range of $5 million) to unnamed charities. The media had not been full of the news that this act had not lowered the ticket price by one cent, or that the most enduring legacy of the Victory Tour was likely to be an across-the-board rise in ticket prices to concerts of all sorts. I didn’t say all of this—nor did I mention that $25 Marvin Gaye tickets or $35 Bette Midler tickets are another question, because they cater to specific audiences and they know perfectly well that those audiences can afford those prices. Michael Jackson’s can’t. But I couldn’t get to that. In the time I had and with what wits I could collect, I simply said no.

The next day, I caught a cab to the K.C. airport; the driver asked if I’d been to the show. Yes, I said. “Well,” he said. “I wanted to go and my kids wanted to go and my kids are angry at me because I didn’t take them.” He was white, about 35. “I felt like shit,” he said. “But my wife and I are saving to put a down payment on a house—we can’t spend that kind of money. But I saw this guy on television last night, and he said it wasn’t worth it, and it wasn’t fair, and he made me feel a lot better. I really appreciated that.”

In a better world, I would not have said that that guy was me. But in this vale of tears, you take what you can get and so I did.

An hour later, as I was standing in line to board my flight, a man came up to me—again white and about 30 or maybe 40. “Are you the music critic who was on TV?” he asked. I said yes. “Well thanks. You made me feel decent.” “What do you mean?” I asked.

He went on to explain that in Kansas City, on the weekend of July 6, 1984, not to have tickets to the Jacksons’ concert was, in the eyes of one’s peers and in the eyes of one’s children, a sign of either economic or social failure. It meant that you were a sorry motherfucker up to his eyeballs in debt or that you weren’t connected—that you didn’t count. “I could have afforded the tickets,” he said, “and I thought I knew the right people, but I guess I didn’t. And my kids thought I was a nobody. Seeing you on TV made me understand that it was just a show. I could have done more to get the tickets, and I didn’t, and now I’m not sorry.”

These events brought home to me just how much the Jacksons’ tour is a perfect expression of Reaganomics—if you got jack, you got slack; if you got zip, take a trip—but I knew that. What I didn’t know was that the Jacksons’ tour was, at least in Kansas City, most of all a status event—and that explained all those people who had never been to a rock & roll show before, and would never go again. “Who’s Michael Jackson, Mommy?” a five-year-old in the seat behind me asked. “He’s a singer, darling,” she answered, “and don’t kick the gentleman’s chair.”


Rock & Roll Confidential, August 1984


Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Kansas City Confidential (08/84)

  1. I watched that NIGHTLINE when it aired, and I’m pretty sure the only reason I did (I didn’t usually watch the show, and I was already tired of hearing about the Jacksons tour) was that I saw or heard you were going to be on. (That’s where I learned how your first name was pronounced.) I didn’t see this piece at the time, so it’s nice to get to read it now!

  2. I saw this tour at the Olympic stadium in Montreal. The tickets were $40 each and I attended with my sister-in-law who was also curious. There were 60 000 people at each of the 2 shows. I was sitting more than ½ way back. The opening act was a juggler. The audience at the show I attended, the second show, was “strange” as well. When the show ended and the Jacksons ran off stage, the audience was confused. There still seemed be a lot going on stage still, so the audience sat and waited for the band to come back, so inexperienced with live shows were they that they did not know they were supposed to be clapping and screaming to get the Jacksons back out, which of course they did not really have to do because all of a sudden they were back! The audience became even more confused when one of the Jacksons grabbed the mic and said, “Thank you Toronto!” only to have the mic yanked out of his hand by Michael who said, “Thank you Montreal!” (They had been in Montreal for a couple of days already.) It was a very strange concert experience, one of the strangest I’ve ever had. And a waste of money.

  3. I absolutely love the title ABC has given Marcus: “Rock music critic”. Accept no substitutes. If someone tries to pawn themselves off as a critic of rock performances, or rock culture, rock merchandise, salt or candy, turn these away prejudicially. There’s a music here, folks. We’ve got experts. For someone who loves the genre called rock criticism, it’s thrillingly weird to hear the thing you love referred to so sententiously.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s